<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 1177 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447493</link>
    <description>The NCLT allowed an impleadment application in an oppression and mismanagement petition under Sections 241-242 of the Companies Act. The appellants, daughters of a deceased shareholder and sisters of the respondent against whom allegations were made, sought to be added as parties despite holding less than 10% shareholding required under Section 244. The NCLT held that each family branch should be represented for effective dispute resolution. The appellants, being shareholders with direct substantive interest in the controversy, were deemed necessary and proper parties whose inclusion would facilitate just and fair adjudication of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2023 18:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=737298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 1177 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447493</link>
      <description>The NCLT allowed an impleadment application in an oppression and mismanagement petition under Sections 241-242 of the Companies Act. The appellants, daughters of a deceased shareholder and sisters of the respondent against whom allegations were made, sought to be added as parties despite holding less than 10% shareholding required under Section 244. The NCLT held that each family branch should be represented for effective dispute resolution. The appellants, being shareholders with direct substantive interest in the controversy, were deemed necessary and proper parties whose inclusion would facilitate just and fair adjudication of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>