<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 1170 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447486</link>
    <description>Arrest under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act depends on the authorised officer having recorded material giving reason to believe that the person is guilty of an offence under the Act, and bail under Section 45 requires the Public Prosecutor to be heard and the Court to find reasonable grounds that the accused is not guilty and is not likely to reoffend. The Court considered the petitioner&#039;s cooperation with investigation, repeated examination, absence of incriminating material from the residence, no funds traced to the petitioner&#039;s account, and the absence of a charge sheet in the predicate offence despite prolonged investigation. On those facts, continued incarceration was held unjustified and bail was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2023 10:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=737291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 1170 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447486</link>
      <description>Arrest under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act depends on the authorised officer having recorded material giving reason to believe that the person is guilty of an offence under the Act, and bail under Section 45 requires the Public Prosecutor to be heard and the Court to find reasonable grounds that the accused is not guilty and is not likely to reoffend. The Court considered the petitioner&#039;s cooperation with investigation, repeated examination, absence of incriminating material from the residence, no funds traced to the petitioner&#039;s account, and the absence of a charge sheet in the predicate offence despite prolonged investigation. On those facts, continued incarceration was held unjustified and bail was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>