<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 1332 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311458</link>
    <description>The HC set aside the acquittal orders in a case involving bounced cheques under Section 138 of the NI Act. The HC found that the Trial Court erred by allowing the accused to submit evidence via affidavit, contrary to statutory requirements. The case was remitted back to the Trial Court for proper examination of the accused, with instructions for expedited resolution within three months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2023 11:43:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=737238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 1332 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311458</link>
      <description>The HC set aside the acquittal orders in a case involving bounced cheques under Section 138 of the NI Act. The HC found that the Trial Court erred by allowing the accused to submit evidence via affidavit, contrary to statutory requirements. The case was remitted back to the Trial Court for proper examination of the accused, with instructions for expedited resolution within three months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>