<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 349 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35112</link>
    <description>Customs valuation of second-hand imported photocopier machines may be based on a chartered engineer&#039;s report where the report is supported by relevant factors such as model, year of manufacture, condition, residual life and market comparison. A deduction for post-import reconditioning cost, however, is not permissible when valuing the goods in the condition in which they were imported. The declared value was not accepted on the evidence, and the higher competing report was also rejected for want of cogent basis. Duty, fine and penalty were therefore to be re-quantified on the basis of the first inspection report without any reconditioning deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 349 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35112</link>
      <description>Customs valuation of second-hand imported photocopier machines may be based on a chartered engineer&#039;s report where the report is supported by relevant factors such as model, year of manufacture, condition, residual life and market comparison. A deduction for post-import reconditioning cost, however, is not permissible when valuing the goods in the condition in which they were imported. The declared value was not accepted on the evidence, and the higher competing report was also rejected for want of cogent basis. Duty, fine and penalty were therefore to be re-quantified on the basis of the first inspection report without any reconditioning deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>