<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 237 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35094</link>
    <description>The appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act against the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order was dismissed. The Tribunal ruled that software testing is not classified under &quot;Technical Inspection and Certification&quot; services for Service Tax and that software engineering is exempt. Penalties imposed under the Finance Act, 1994 were upheld. The Tribunal found computer training services exempt within specific dates, becoming taxable post-amendment. The appeal lacked merit due to these findings, and subsequent notification modifications were not considered, resulting in dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 237 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35094</link>
      <description>The appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act against the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order was dismissed. The Tribunal ruled that software testing is not classified under &quot;Technical Inspection and Certification&quot; services for Service Tax and that software engineering is exempt. Penalties imposed under the Finance Act, 1994 were upheld. The Tribunal found computer training services exempt within specific dates, becoming taxable post-amendment. The appeal lacked merit due to these findings, and subsequent notification modifications were not considered, resulting in dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>