https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311446 The court quashed the proceedings against the petitioner, who was the General Manager of the company, in C.C.No. 381 of 2006. The court found that the summons issued to her lacked a legal basis, as she was not impleaded in the proceedings nor named in the charge sheet. The judgment emphasized that specific allegations regarding her role and responsibility in the company's affairs were necessary to establish liability. The absence of such allegations in the complaint led to the conclusion that the proceedings against her constituted an abuse of process. en-us Thu, 04 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Dec 2023 15:14:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311446 The court quashed the proceedings against the petitioner, who was the General Manager of the company, in C.C.No. 381 of 2006. The court found that the summons issued to her lacked a legal basis, as she was not impleaded in the proceedings nor named in the charge sheet. The judgment emphasized that specific allegations regarding her role and responsibility in the company's affairs were necessary to establish liability. The absence of such allegations in the complaint led to the conclusion that the proceedings against her constituted an abuse of process. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 04 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311446