<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 339 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35083</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to remand the issue of provision for expenditure back to the assessing officer for determination based on the completion stage of the project, as allowed by Accounting Standard 7. The Court found no legal basis to support the revenue&#039;s appeal and hence dismissed it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 339 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35083</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to remand the issue of provision for expenditure back to the assessing officer for determination based on the completion stage of the project, as allowed by Accounting Standard 7. The Court found no legal basis to support the revenue&#039;s appeal and hence dismissed it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>