<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 1124 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447440</link>
    <description>The ITAT Rajkot dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding assessment proceedings against a deceased assessee. The AO, despite knowing of the assessee&#039;s death and legal heir representation, passed the assessment order and subsequent notices in the deceased person&#039;s name rather than the legal heir&#039;s name. The ITAT held that this defect rendered the assessment order void ab-initio and was not curable under Section 292B, as the AO consciously chose to use the deceased&#039;s name. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision declaring the assessment order invalid was upheld, distinguishing it from the Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana HC precedent where the legal heir was properly acknowledged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2023 17:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=736831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 1124 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447440</link>
      <description>The ITAT Rajkot dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding assessment proceedings against a deceased assessee. The AO, despite knowing of the assessee&#039;s death and legal heir representation, passed the assessment order and subsequent notices in the deceased person&#039;s name rather than the legal heir&#039;s name. The ITAT held that this defect rendered the assessment order void ab-initio and was not curable under Section 292B, as the AO consciously chose to use the deceased&#039;s name. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision declaring the assessment order invalid was upheld, distinguishing it from the Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana HC precedent where the legal heir was properly acknowledged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>