<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 1118 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447434</link>
    <description>ITAT Surat held that mobile or truck-mounted cranes used in a hiring business qualify for higher depreciation at 30% as motor lorries under section 32 read with rule 5 and Appendix I, rather than ordinary machinery at 15%. The tribunal followed jurisdictional High Court guidance that Motor Vehicles Act registration is not a necessary condition for the higher rate and that cranes mounted on trucks should not be denied the applicable schedule entry merely because they are not separately listed. Consistent treatment on identical facts also supported the same depreciation claim in later years, so the Revenue&#039;s disallowance was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2023 10:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=736825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 1118 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447434</link>
      <description>ITAT Surat held that mobile or truck-mounted cranes used in a hiring business qualify for higher depreciation at 30% as motor lorries under section 32 read with rule 5 and Appendix I, rather than ordinary machinery at 15%. The tribunal followed jurisdictional High Court guidance that Motor Vehicles Act registration is not a necessary condition for the higher rate and that cranes mounted on trucks should not be denied the applicable schedule entry merely because they are not separately listed. Consistent treatment on identical facts also supported the same depreciation claim in later years, so the Revenue&#039;s disallowance was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>