<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 1116 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447432</link>
    <description>ITAT Surat held that hospital receipts found during survey should be taxed as business income under section 28, not under section 68 with section 115BBE provisions. The assessee had already disclosed additional income in revised return, making re-addition inappropriate. CIT(A) correctly allowed section 35AD deduction for capital expenditure as hospital had over 100 beds confirmed by supplier statement and photographs. Revenue&#039;s appeal dismissed on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2023 10:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=736823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 1116 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447432</link>
      <description>ITAT Surat held that hospital receipts found during survey should be taxed as business income under section 28, not under section 68 with section 115BBE provisions. The assessee had already disclosed additional income in revised return, making re-addition inappropriate. CIT(A) correctly allowed section 35AD deduction for capital expenditure as hospital had over 100 beds confirmed by supplier statement and photographs. Revenue&#039;s appeal dismissed on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447432</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>