<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 206 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35076</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the allowability of a deduction under section 36(1)(vii) was dismissed by the court. The court upheld the decision of the Tribunal, which found that the assessee, a clearing and forwarding agent, satisfied the conditions of section 36(2) for the claim under section 36(1)(vii). Despite the Revenue&#039;s argument that the assessee was not engaged in money-lending business, the court agreed with the lower authorities&#039; findings of systematic money-lending activities by the assessee. As a result, the appeal was dismissed, and no substantial question of law was found to entertain the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 206 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35076</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the allowability of a deduction under section 36(1)(vii) was dismissed by the court. The court upheld the decision of the Tribunal, which found that the assessee, a clearing and forwarding agent, satisfied the conditions of section 36(2) for the claim under section 36(1)(vii). Despite the Revenue&#039;s argument that the assessee was not engaged in money-lending business, the court agreed with the lower authorities&#039; findings of systematic money-lending activities by the assessee. As a result, the appeal was dismissed, and no substantial question of law was found to entertain the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35076</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>