<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1665 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311432</link>
    <description>ITAT Kolkata ruled in favor of the assessee regarding addition under section 68 for disallowance of losses deemed bogus due to alleged client code modification by broker. Following the precedent in Kundan Investment Ltd. case by Calcutta HC, the tribunal held that the claimed loss was genuine and eligible for deduction. The unexplained cash credit addition was found unsustainable and directed to be deleted, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2023 06:11:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=736800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1665 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311432</link>
      <description>ITAT Kolkata ruled in favor of the assessee regarding addition under section 68 for disallowance of losses deemed bogus due to alleged client code modification by broker. Following the precedent in Kundan Investment Ltd. case by Calcutta HC, the tribunal held that the claimed loss was genuine and eligible for deduction. The unexplained cash credit addition was found unsustainable and directed to be deleted, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311432</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>