<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 66 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35070</link>
    <description>SC held that payment to Life Insurance Corporation for a Group Gratuity Fund qualified for deduction under section 36(1)(v). The Court ruled that while fiscal statutes are construed strictly, reasonable construction may be applied to effect legislative intent. Because the trust was irrevocable, created exclusively for employees, and the employer had no control over the funds, the statutory conditions were satisfied and the deduction was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 12:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 66 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35070</link>
      <description>SC held that payment to Life Insurance Corporation for a Group Gratuity Fund qualified for deduction under section 36(1)(v). The Court ruled that while fiscal statutes are construed strictly, reasonable construction may be applied to effect legislative intent. Because the trust was irrevocable, created exclusively for employees, and the employer had no control over the funds, the statutory conditions were satisfied and the deduction was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>