<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 235 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35063</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the appeal by the Commissioner of Income-tax, finding that a regular assessment can proceed alongside a block assessment under Chapter XIV-B. The Court held that the assessments for disclosed and undisclosed income are distinct, and therefore, can be conducted simultaneously. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to merge the assessments was overturned, and the matter was remanded for reconsideration in line with the law, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 235 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35063</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the appeal by the Commissioner of Income-tax, finding that a regular assessment can proceed alongside a block assessment under Chapter XIV-B. The Court held that the assessments for disclosed and undisclosed income are distinct, and therefore, can be conducted simultaneously. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to merge the assessments was overturned, and the matter was remanded for reconsideration in line with the law, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>