<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1414 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311421</link>
    <description>The NCLAT dismissed appeals challenging a resolution plan for a housing finance corporation that extinguished fixed deposit holders&#039; claims without full payment. The appellants argued this violated NHB Act and RBI Act provisions, constituted preferential transactions, and exceeded the Committee of Creditors&#039; commercial wisdom. The NCLAT declined to re-examine these issues as they had already been decided in previous appeals involving the same resolution plan and similar parties. The tribunal found no grounds for interference with the adjudicating authority&#039;s approval of the resolution plan and disposed of the appeals accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2023 09:26:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=736648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1414 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311421</link>
      <description>The NCLAT dismissed appeals challenging a resolution plan for a housing finance corporation that extinguished fixed deposit holders&#039; claims without full payment. The appellants argued this violated NHB Act and RBI Act provisions, constituted preferential transactions, and exceeded the Committee of Creditors&#039; commercial wisdom. The NCLAT declined to re-examine these issues as they had already been decided in previous appeals involving the same resolution plan and similar parties. The tribunal found no grounds for interference with the adjudicating authority&#039;s approval of the resolution plan and disposed of the appeals accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>