https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311412 A High Court exercising Article 226 jurisdiction may decline to entertain a writ petition where only an insignificant part of the cause of action arose within its territory and the dispute is substantially connected to another forum. The court applied the doctrine of forum non conveniens, noting that the loan transaction, mortgaged property, alleged natural calamity loss, restructuring request, and impugned action were all situated outside Delhi. A minimal territorial link was insufficient to make Delhi the proper forum, and the discretionary writ jurisdiction was therefore not required to be exercised. The petitioner was directed to approach the appropriate forum. en-us Tue, 26 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Dec 2023 09:26:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311412 A High Court exercising Article 226 jurisdiction may decline to entertain a writ petition where only an insignificant part of the cause of action arose within its territory and the dispute is substantially connected to another forum. The court applied the doctrine of forum non conveniens, noting that the loan transaction, mortgaged property, alleged natural calamity loss, restructuring request, and impugned action were all situated outside Delhi. A minimal territorial link was insufficient to make Delhi the proper forum, and the discretionary writ jurisdiction was therefore not required to be exercised. The petitioner was directed to approach the appropriate forum. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 26 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311412