https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311411 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226 depends on a real and material cause of action with a nexus to the relief sought. The mere location of the corporate office, or the place where an administrative decision or circular was issued, does not by itself confer jurisdiction if the decision is to be implemented elsewhere. Because the petitioners worked at Noida and the relief would operate there, the Delhi High Court held that no material cause of action arose within Delhi. Section 27 of the National Capital Region Planning Board Act, 1985 gives the Act overriding effect but does not alter the law on territorial jurisdiction or deem cause of action to arise in Delhi merely because Noida is within the NCR. en-us Mon, 02 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Dec 2023 09:26:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311411 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226 depends on a real and material cause of action with a nexus to the relief sought. The mere location of the corporate office, or the place where an administrative decision or circular was issued, does not by itself confer jurisdiction if the decision is to be implemented elsewhere. Because the petitioners worked at Noida and the relief would operate there, the Delhi High Court held that no material cause of action arose within Delhi. Section 27 of the National Capital Region Planning Board Act, 1985 gives the Act overriding effect but does not alter the law on territorial jurisdiction or deem cause of action to arise in Delhi merely because Noida is within the NCR. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 02 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311411