<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 1072 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447388</link>
    <description>NCLAT Chennai dismissed an appeal challenging liquidation order after resolution plan failure. The appellant sought modification of repayment terms, promising Rs.25 crores in no-lien account and Rs.15 crores within three weeks. Despite majority creditor accepting modified terms in September 2021, appellant failed to pay required Rs.83.07 crores by November 2021. Court noted two-and-half years elapsed since 2019 plan approval with multiple opportunities given. NCLAT emphasized IBC&#039;s time-bound nature and strict timeline adherence per SC precedents, ruling adjudicating authority correctly allowed liquidation application under Section 33 of IBC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2023 15:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=736607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 1072 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447388</link>
      <description>NCLAT Chennai dismissed an appeal challenging liquidation order after resolution plan failure. The appellant sought modification of repayment terms, promising Rs.25 crores in no-lien account and Rs.15 crores within three weeks. Despite majority creditor accepting modified terms in September 2021, appellant failed to pay required Rs.83.07 crores by November 2021. Court noted two-and-half years elapsed since 2019 plan approval with multiple opportunities given. NCLAT emphasized IBC&#039;s time-bound nature and strict timeline adherence per SC precedents, ruling adjudicating authority correctly allowed liquidation application under Section 33 of IBC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>