https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311407 The court determined that the offence of criminal breach of trust under Section 406 IPC is a continuing offence. It ruled that the non-return of stridhan by the husband and other relations constitutes a continuing offence, allowing a fresh cause of action each day the stridhan is not returned. Consequently, the complaint is not barred by the limitation period under Section 468(2)(c) CrPC. The court also found the complaint sufficiently specific, dismissing claims of vagueness. The petition was dismissed, and the petitioner was directed to appear before the trial court. en-us Wed, 09 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Dec 2023 17:45:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311407 The court determined that the offence of criminal breach of trust under Section 406 IPC is a continuing offence. It ruled that the non-return of stridhan by the husband and other relations constitutes a continuing offence, allowing a fresh cause of action each day the stridhan is not returned. Consequently, the complaint is not barred by the limitation period under Section 468(2)(c) CrPC. The court also found the complaint sufficiently specific, dismissing claims of vagueness. The petition was dismissed, and the petitioner was directed to appear before the trial court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 09 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311407