https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311407 Criminal breach of trust was treated as a continuing offence for limitation purposes because the unlawful retention of entrusted property persists until it is restored to the person entitled to it, attracting a fresh period of limitation under the Code of Criminal Procedure and preventing the bar under Section 468. The complaint was also not quashed for vagueness, as it clearly alleged entrustment of stridhan and refusal to return it despite repeated requests; the omission of some intervening persons' names did not undermine the core accusation. The petition was therefore dismissed, and the complaint was held to be within limitation and otherwise maintainable. en-us Wed, 09 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Dec 2023 17:45:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311407 Criminal breach of trust was treated as a continuing offence for limitation purposes because the unlawful retention of entrusted property persists until it is restored to the person entitled to it, attracting a fresh period of limitation under the Code of Criminal Procedure and preventing the bar under Section 468. The complaint was also not quashed for vagueness, as it clearly alleged entrustment of stridhan and refusal to return it despite repeated requests; the omission of some intervening persons' names did not undermine the core accusation. The petition was therefore dismissed, and the complaint was held to be within limitation and otherwise maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 09 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311407