https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311406 The SC allowed the appeals, overturning the HC's judgment that ordered a retrial due to defective charges. The SC found no evidence that the accused were misled or that justice failed due to charge defects, as per Sections 215, 221, and 464 of the CrPC. It criticized the HC for not examining the case merits and noted that a retrial was unjustified without a proper appeal against acquittals. The case was remitted to the HC for a fresh decision on merits, emphasizing the need for clear evidence of justice failure before ordering a retrial. en-us Mon, 12 Sep 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Dec 2023 17:45:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311406 The SC allowed the appeals, overturning the HC's judgment that ordered a retrial due to defective charges. The SC found no evidence that the accused were misled or that justice failed due to charge defects, as per Sections 215, 221, and 464 of the CrPC. It criticized the HC for not examining the case merits and noted that a retrial was unjustified without a proper appeal against acquittals. The case was remitted to the HC for a fresh decision on merits, emphasizing the need for clear evidence of justice failure before ordering a retrial. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 Sep 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311406