https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311403 The SC dismissed the appeals against the conviction and death penalty of A-1 and A-2, affirming the decisions of the lower courts due to compelling evidence of their involvement in a brutal massacre under Section 34 IPC. Conversely, the appeal against A-3's acquittal was also dismissed, as the HC found insufficient evidence of her participation in furtherance of the common intention, warranting her acquittal. Justice R.P. Sethi concurred, emphasizing that common intention is a factual determination, and passive presence does not suffice for conviction under Section 34 IPC without proven shared intent. en-us Fri, 02 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 May 2024 11:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311403 The SC dismissed the appeals against the conviction and death penalty of A-1 and A-2, affirming the decisions of the lower courts due to compelling evidence of their involvement in a brutal massacre under Section 34 IPC. Conversely, the appeal against A-3's acquittal was also dismissed, as the HC found insufficient evidence of her participation in furtherance of the common intention, warranting her acquittal. Justice R.P. Sethi concurred, emphasizing that common intention is a factual determination, and passive presence does not suffice for conviction under Section 34 IPC without proven shared intent. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 02 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311403