https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311402 The SC partially allowed the appeal, modifying the sentences of A-1 and A-3, reducing their imprisonment from seven years to five years under Part-1 of Section 304/34 IPC, due to their involvement in a murderous assault with deadly weapons. A-2 was acquitted, as his actions were justified under the right of private defence of property per Section 104 IPC. The Court found that the deceased and his sons' actions amounted to criminal trespass, warranting only non-lethal harm by the appellants. en-us Tue, 09 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Dec 2023 13:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311402 The SC partially allowed the appeal, modifying the sentences of A-1 and A-3, reducing their imprisonment from seven years to five years under Part-1 of Section 304/34 IPC, due to their involvement in a murderous assault with deadly weapons. A-2 was acquitted, as his actions were justified under the right of private defence of property per Section 104 IPC. The Court found that the deceased and his sons' actions amounted to criminal trespass, warranting only non-lethal harm by the appellants. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311402