https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311390 In an insolvency and bankruptcy appeal, the SC found no cogent reason to entertain the challenge and held that the impugned judgment did not warrant interference. The appeal was accordingly dismissed. The order reflects limited appellate intervention where the court is not satisfied that the lower decision calls for review on the record placed before it. en-us Fri, 25 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Dec 2023 09:44:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311390 In an insolvency and bankruptcy appeal, the SC found no cogent reason to entertain the challenge and held that the impugned judgment did not warrant interference. The appeal was accordingly dismissed. The order reflects limited appellate intervention where the court is not satisfied that the lower decision calls for review on the record placed before it. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Fri, 25 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311390