<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 1033 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447349</link>
    <description>The SC/Tribunal examined a tax penalty case under section 271(1)(c). After analyzing technical defects in the penalty notice and the nature of the expenditure, the tribunal found insufficient grounds for penalty. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer for alleged income concealment, emphasizing procedural and substantive legal requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 May 2025 11:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=736461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 1033 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447349</link>
      <description>The SC/Tribunal examined a tax penalty case under section 271(1)(c). After analyzing technical defects in the penalty notice and the nature of the expenditure, the tribunal found insufficient grounds for penalty. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer for alleged income concealment, emphasizing procedural and substantive legal requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>