https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447330 A recall application alleging fraud in obtaining permission to amend a section 7 application was found misconceived because the Supreme Court had remanded the matter and expressly permitted the amendment in the pending appeal. The Tribunal found no error or misstatement in the earlier order that would justify recall, noted that the later admission order and dismissal of the subsequent appeal had not been challenged, and held that recall jurisdiction could not be used to reopen a concluded appellate order on an unsubstantiated fraud allegation. The request to recall the order dated 16.10.2023 was declined. en-us Thu, 21 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Dec 2023 09:42:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447330 A recall application alleging fraud in obtaining permission to amend a section 7 application was found misconceived because the Supreme Court had remanded the matter and expressly permitted the amendment in the pending appeal. The Tribunal found no error or misstatement in the earlier order that would justify recall, noted that the later admission order and dismissal of the subsequent appeal had not been challenged, and held that recall jurisdiction could not be used to reopen a concluded appellate order on an unsubstantiated fraud allegation. The request to recall the order dated 16.10.2023 was declined. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Thu, 21 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447330