<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (6) TMI 609 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311373</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the CBI failed to comply with the SC&#039;s directives in Vineet Narain&#039;s case, specifically the requirement to report to the CVC. The court emphasized that these directives were mandatory and found that the CBI bypassed the CVC by filing the charge-sheet directly before the Special Judge. As a result, the court allowed the petition, quashed the cognizance taken by the Special Judge, and all related proceedings. The prosecution was permitted to file a new charge-sheet following the proper procedure. The petitioner&#039;s bail conditions, as imposed by the SC, remained unchanged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2023 14:10:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=736328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (6) TMI 609 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311373</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the CBI failed to comply with the SC&#039;s directives in Vineet Narain&#039;s case, specifically the requirement to report to the CVC. The court emphasized that these directives were mandatory and found that the CBI bypassed the CVC by filing the charge-sheet directly before the Special Judge. As a result, the court allowed the petition, quashed the cognizance taken by the Special Judge, and all related proceedings. The prosecution was permitted to file a new charge-sheet following the proper procedure. The petitioner&#039;s bail conditions, as imposed by the SC, remained unchanged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>