https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311372 The Privy Council dismissed the appellant's appeal, affirming the trial's validity and the conviction for the murder of his uncle. The HC rejected the claim of illegal arrest, noting the lawful surrender of the appellant to the Rohtak Court by Jind authorities. Additionally, the Privy Council found the jurisdictional challenge unsubstantiated, interpreting a Gazette Notification's typographical error as sufficient to assign jurisdiction to the Deputy Commissioner of Rohtak. The appellant's arguments regarding both the arrest and jurisdiction were deemed insufficient to overturn the conviction. en-us Wed, 26 Jan 1944 00:00:00 +0630 Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:21:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311372 The Privy Council dismissed the appellant's appeal, affirming the trial's validity and the conviction for the murder of his uncle. The HC rejected the claim of illegal arrest, noting the lawful surrender of the appellant to the Rohtak Court by Jind authorities. Additionally, the Privy Council found the jurisdictional challenge unsubstantiated, interpreting a Gazette Notification's typographical error as sufficient to assign jurisdiction to the Deputy Commissioner of Rohtak. The appellant's arguments regarding both the arrest and jurisdiction were deemed insufficient to overturn the conviction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 Jan 1944 00:00:00 +0630 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311372