<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1949 (5) TMI 22 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311371</link>
    <description>A prosecution instituted without the required valid statutory sanction is a nullity, and any acquittal entered in that proceeding is not an acquittal by a court of competent jurisdiction. The bar under Section 403 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the common law plea of autrefois acquit, applies only where the accused was previously tried lawfully by a competent court. The prior acquittal therefore did not create double jeopardy and did not bar a fresh prosecution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2023 13:21:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=736322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1949 (5) TMI 22 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311371</link>
      <description>A prosecution instituted without the required valid statutory sanction is a nullity, and any acquittal entered in that proceeding is not an acquittal by a court of competent jurisdiction. The bar under Section 403 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the common law plea of autrefois acquit, applies only where the accused was previously tried lawfully by a competent court. The prior acquittal therefore did not create double jeopardy and did not bar a fresh prosecution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>