https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35022 The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the notices issued under section 226(3) of the Income-tax Act, and directed the Department to refund the sum of Rs. 18,57,999 to the banks with interest at nine percent. The court found that the Department lacked jurisdiction to proceed against the petitioner and recognized the petitioner as the successor of the mutt, thereby concluding that the petitioner had the right to challenge the Department's actions. en-us Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35022 The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the notices issued under section 226(3) of the Income-tax Act, and directed the Department to refund the sum of Rs. 18,57,999 to the banks with interest at nine percent. The court found that the Department lacked jurisdiction to proceed against the petitioner and recognized the petitioner as the successor of the mutt, thereby concluding that the petitioner had the right to challenge the Department's actions. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35022