<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 958 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447274</link>
    <description>NCLAT Principal Bench set aside the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order directing matter back to Committee of Creditors (CoC) for reconsideration of resolution plans. The Tribunal held that remanding to CoC was contrary to its earlier direction dated 09.02.2023, which had disapproved sending matter to CoC and instead directed the Adjudicating Authority to examine plan approval application within three months. NCLAT ruled that prolonging proceedings by seeking CoC&#039;s opinion served no purpose and set aside all consequential actions including subsequent CoC meetings. Appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2023 06:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=736239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 958 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447274</link>
      <description>NCLAT Principal Bench set aside the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order directing matter back to Committee of Creditors (CoC) for reconsideration of resolution plans. The Tribunal held that remanding to CoC was contrary to its earlier direction dated 09.02.2023, which had disapproved sending matter to CoC and instead directed the Adjudicating Authority to examine plan approval application within three months. NCLAT ruled that prolonging proceedings by seeking CoC&#039;s opinion served no purpose and set aside all consequential actions including subsequent CoC meetings. Appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>