https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447261 The HC dismissed a civil revision petition challenging a professional misconduct order passed by the Council under Section 22A of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. The court held that while it retains supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 over subordinate courts and tribunals, the Board of Discipline cannot be considered a tribunal since professional misconduct proceedings do not constitute a "lis" requiring adjudication between parties. The court distinguished between bodies exercising judicial power to adjudicate disputes and those conducting disciplinary proceedings, ruling the revision petition was not maintainable. en-us Tue, 12 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Dec 2023 09:40:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447261 The HC dismissed a civil revision petition challenging a professional misconduct order passed by the Council under Section 22A of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. The court held that while it retains supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 over subordinate courts and tribunals, the Board of Discipline cannot be considered a tribunal since professional misconduct proceedings do not constitute a "lis" requiring adjudication between parties. The court distinguished between bodies exercising judicial power to adjudicate disputes and those conducting disciplinary proceedings, ruling the revision petition was not maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447261