https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311363 The court overturned the appellant's convictions under Sections 3(5) and 3(1) of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act due to the absence of necessary legal prerequisites and the timing of the alleged acts. However, the conviction under Section 365 of the IPC was upheld. The court found credible evidence supporting the appellant's involvement in the wrongful confinement of the victim, motivated by allegations of passing information to the army. The appeal for leniency was denied, and the appellant was sentenced to 5 years of rigorous imprisonment, underscoring the seriousness of the offence. en-us Mon, 12 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Dec 2023 18:01:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311363 The court overturned the appellant's convictions under Sections 3(5) and 3(1) of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act due to the absence of necessary legal prerequisites and the timing of the alleged acts. However, the conviction under Section 365 of the IPC was upheld. The court found credible evidence supporting the appellant's involvement in the wrongful confinement of the victim, motivated by allegations of passing information to the army. The appeal for leniency was denied, and the appellant was sentenced to 5 years of rigorous imprisonment, underscoring the seriousness of the offence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311363