<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1949 (8) TMI 27 - NAGPUR HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311359</link>
    <description>The HC of Nagpur upheld the lower court&#039;s decision favoring the Plaintiff in a foreclosure suit. The Defendant&#039;s appeal, challenging the due attestation of the mortgage, was dismissed as the attestation was sufficiently proven. The Court confirmed that in a mortgage by conditional sale, it lacks discretion to order a sale, thereby affirming the foreclosure decree. Furthermore, the request for Appellant&#039;s Counsel fees was denied since the appeal was unsuccessful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 17:54:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=736203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1949 (8) TMI 27 - NAGPUR HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311359</link>
      <description>The HC of Nagpur upheld the lower court&#039;s decision favoring the Plaintiff in a foreclosure suit. The Defendant&#039;s appeal, challenging the due attestation of the mortgage, was dismissed as the attestation was sufficiently proven. The Court confirmed that in a mortgage by conditional sale, it lacks discretion to order a sale, thereby affirming the foreclosure decree. Furthermore, the request for Appellant&#039;s Counsel fees was denied since the appeal was unsuccessful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>