<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 931 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311357</link>
    <description>The SC set aside the HC&#039;s order that allowed the Plaintiff to file additional documents and recall a witness, reinstating the trial Court&#039;s decision to dismiss the applications under Order VII Rule 14 and Order XVIII Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The SC emphasized that recalling witnesses should be sparingly used and not to remedy evidentiary gaps. The appeal was allowed, restoring the trial Court&#039;s order, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 17:41:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=736200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 931 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311357</link>
      <description>The SC set aside the HC&#039;s order that allowed the Plaintiff to file additional documents and recall a witness, reinstating the trial Court&#039;s decision to dismiss the applications under Order VII Rule 14 and Order XVIII Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The SC emphasized that recalling witnesses should be sparingly used and not to remedy evidentiary gaps. The appeal was allowed, restoring the trial Court&#039;s order, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>