<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Purchase of Disputed Property from Relative Upheld; Principal Commissioner&#039;s Order Overturned.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73699</link>
    <description>Applicability of section 56 on disputed property as purchased from relative - Additions u/s 56(2)(x) - since the assessee has purchased the land from the ‘relative’ and the said contention was duly supported by the genealogical tree, and the said fact has also already been examined by the AO, thus, in our considered opinion, the order of the Pr. CIT deserves to be quashed. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 09:30:08 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 09:30:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=736058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Purchase of Disputed Property from Relative Upheld; Principal Commissioner&#039;s Order Overturned.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73699</link>
      <description>Applicability of section 56 on disputed property as purchased from relative - Additions u/s 56(2)(x) - since the assessee has purchased the land from the ‘relative’ and the said contention was duly supported by the genealogical tree, and the said fact has also already been examined by the AO, thus, in our considered opinion, the order of the Pr. CIT deserves to be quashed. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 09:30:08 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>