<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 79 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34998</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the necessity for the Assessing Officer to be given an opportunity when new evidence is introduced, as per rule 46A(3) of the Income-tax Rules. The Court dismissed the appeal, finding that the first appellate authority did not comply with procedural requirements for introducing additional evidence, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s order and concluding the legal proceedings in the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 79 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34998</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the necessity for the Assessing Officer to be given an opportunity when new evidence is introduced, as per rule 46A(3) of the Income-tax Rules. The Court dismissed the appeal, finding that the first appellate authority did not comply with procedural requirements for introducing additional evidence, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s order and concluding the legal proceedings in the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>