https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447230 Madras HC dismissed writ petitions challenging FEMA adjudication orders, ruling that show cause notices were properly served under Rule 14(b) and 14(c) at the last known business address. The court held that non-availability of noticees at the address during service did not invalidate the notices or violate natural justice principles. Regarding liability of nominee directors under Section 42(1), the court declined to decide on merits, stating such issues should be adjudicated through the statutory appellate hierarchy. The court emphasized that when specific appellate remedies exist under FEMA Sections 19 and 35, writ jurisdiction should not bypass this statutory framework. Petitioners were directed to pursue appeals before the Appellate Tribunal. en-us Mon, 11 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Dec 2023 09:29:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447230 Madras HC dismissed writ petitions challenging FEMA adjudication orders, ruling that show cause notices were properly served under Rule 14(b) and 14(c) at the last known business address. The court held that non-availability of noticees at the address during service did not invalidate the notices or violate natural justice principles. Regarding liability of nominee directors under Section 42(1), the court declined to decide on merits, stating such issues should be adjudicated through the statutory appellate hierarchy. The court emphasized that when specific appellate remedies exist under FEMA Sections 19 and 35, writ jurisdiction should not bypass this statutory framework. Petitioners were directed to pursue appeals before the Appellate Tribunal. Case-Laws FEMA Mon, 11 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447230