https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447229 Custody does not become illegal merely because cognizance is deferred and a fresh remand order is not separately recorded on the same day, where the prosecution complaint has been filed in time and judicial custody remains continuous. The Delhi High Court treated investigative remand and post-cognizance remand as distinct, but held that the accused remained in lawful court custody pending the next judicial stage. It also held that production warrants, the transfer of the complaint, and the procedural record preserved continuity of custody and negatived any claim of a break rendering detention unlawful. Habeas corpus relief was therefore not made out. en-us Tue, 19 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Dec 2023 12:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447229 Custody does not become illegal merely because cognizance is deferred and a fresh remand order is not separately recorded on the same day, where the prosecution complaint has been filed in time and judicial custody remains continuous. The Delhi High Court treated investigative remand and post-cognizance remand as distinct, but held that the accused remained in lawful court custody pending the next judicial stage. It also held that production warrants, the transfer of the complaint, and the procedural record preserved continuity of custody and negatived any claim of a break rendering detention unlawful. Habeas corpus relief was therefore not made out. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 19 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447229