<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 912 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447228</link>
    <description>The HC disposed of a writ petition challenging proceedings related to service tax non-payment by a hospital operator. The petitioners alleged suppression of facts and disputed invocation of extended limitation period. The court held that issues regarding the concessionaire agreement&#039;s interpretation, state contribution to hospital operations, jurisdictional questions, and validity of extended limitation period were factual matters requiring determination by statutory appellate authorities. The court relegated petitioners to appellate remedy, allowing appeal filing within four weeks, noting that revenue proceedings were initiated only after investigation revealed the arrangement during inquiry into the hospital&#039;s service tax non-payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 09:28:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=736032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 912 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447228</link>
      <description>The HC disposed of a writ petition challenging proceedings related to service tax non-payment by a hospital operator. The petitioners alleged suppression of facts and disputed invocation of extended limitation period. The court held that issues regarding the concessionaire agreement&#039;s interpretation, state contribution to hospital operations, jurisdictional questions, and validity of extended limitation period were factual matters requiring determination by statutory appellate authorities. The court relegated petitioners to appellate remedy, allowing appeal filing within four weeks, noting that revenue proceedings were initiated only after investigation revealed the arrangement during inquiry into the hospital&#039;s service tax non-payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447228</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>