<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 905 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447221</link>
    <description>CESTAT Kolkata held that loading of scrap into trucks for transportation does not constitute Manpower Recruitment Service under service tax provisions. The appellant charged per trip basis for specific loading work using crane and operators, not for supplying manpower. Since payment was trip-based rather than manpower-based, the service could not be categorized as Manpower Recruitment Service. Consequently, service tax demand was unsustainable, and associated interest and penalty were also set aside. Appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2023 15:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=736024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 905 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447221</link>
      <description>CESTAT Kolkata held that loading of scrap into trucks for transportation does not constitute Manpower Recruitment Service under service tax provisions. The appellant charged per trip basis for specific loading work using crane and operators, not for supplying manpower. Since payment was trip-based rather than manpower-based, the service could not be categorized as Manpower Recruitment Service. Consequently, service tax demand was unsustainable, and associated interest and penalty were also set aside. Appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>