<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 269 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34993</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the Revisional Order under section 84 of the Finance Act, 1994 to be unsustainable due to the lack of opportunity for the appellant to know the charges in advance. Emphasizing the importance of natural justice and adherence to Circulars, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding it for further proceedings to ensure the appellant&#039;s rights are upheld and legal principles are followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 269 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34993</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the Revisional Order under section 84 of the Finance Act, 1994 to be unsustainable due to the lack of opportunity for the appellant to know the charges in advance. Emphasizing the importance of natural justice and adherence to Circulars, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding it for further proceedings to ensure the appellant&#039;s rights are upheld and legal principles are followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>