<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 74 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34991</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking mandamus for early disposal of an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise &amp;amp; Customs, Chandigarh. Despite the delay in pronouncing the orders, the Court held that the delay alone did not render the Appellate Authority&#039;s order illegal. Emphasizing the need to follow statutory procedures, the Court allowed the petitioner to challenge the order in separate proceedings, with each party bearing their own costs. The judgment underscores the importance of seeking appropriate remedies within statutory provisions rather than solely relying on delay as a ground for challenging orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 12:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 74 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34991</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking mandamus for early disposal of an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise &amp;amp; Customs, Chandigarh. Despite the delay in pronouncing the orders, the Court held that the delay alone did not render the Appellate Authority&#039;s order illegal. Emphasizing the need to follow statutory procedures, the Court allowed the petitioner to challenge the order in separate proceedings, with each party bearing their own costs. The judgment underscores the importance of seeking appropriate remedies within statutory provisions rather than solely relying on delay as a ground for challenging orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>