<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 73 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34987</link>
    <description>CESTAT, Ahmedabad held that where a service is fully performed outside India the proviso to rule 3 of the Taxation of Services (Provided from Outside India and Received in India) Rules, 2006 does not apply, as that proviso addresses partly-performed services and valuation disputes. Because the reverse-charge mechanism was not attracted, no service tax liability arose and the refund claim was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 15:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 73 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34987</link>
      <description>CESTAT, Ahmedabad held that where a service is fully performed outside India the proviso to rule 3 of the Taxation of Services (Provided from Outside India and Received in India) Rules, 2006 does not apply, as that proviso addresses partly-performed services and valuation disputes. Because the reverse-charge mechanism was not attracted, no service tax liability arose and the refund claim was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>