<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 78 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34985</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to reduce the penalty under section 76 for three respondents providing cable service. Despite upholding the penalty under section 78, the Tribunal found valid reasons for reducing the penalty under section 76 due to the circumstances presented by the respondents, including payment of service tax with interest and challenges faced as small-scale operators. As there was no challenge to the penalty under section 78, the focus remained on section 76, leading to the rejection of the revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 78 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34985</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to reduce the penalty under section 76 for three respondents providing cable service. Despite upholding the penalty under section 78, the Tribunal found valid reasons for reducing the penalty under section 76 due to the circumstances presented by the respondents, including payment of service tax with interest and challenges faced as small-scale operators. As there was no challenge to the penalty under section 78, the focus remained on section 76, leading to the rejection of the revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34985</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>