https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311329 Continued custody after committal or adjournment is lawful only if the court passes a specific remand order after applying its mind to the circumstances. Mere fixation of a future date for appearance or a mechanical endorsement on the custody warrant does not satisfy Sections 209 and 309 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The note links this requirement to the constitutional safeguards of personal liberty and fair procedure under Articles 14, 21 and 22, and states that absence of a proper remand order renders detention illegal and supports release on bail. en-us Thu, 20 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Dec 2023 11:46:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311329 Continued custody after committal or adjournment is lawful only if the court passes a specific remand order after applying its mind to the circumstances. Mere fixation of a future date for appearance or a mechanical endorsement on the custody warrant does not satisfy Sections 209 and 309 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The note links this requirement to the constitutional safeguards of personal liberty and fair procedure under Articles 14, 21 and 22, and states that absence of a proper remand order renders detention illegal and supports release on bail. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 20 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311329