https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311329 Continued custody after commitment or adjournment of trial requires a specific remand order showing judicial application of mind. Section 209 governs remand at the commitment stage, while Section 309(2) requires a fresh remand warrant when custody continues after trial is postponed or adjourned. Merely fixing a future appearance date or mechanically endorsing a custody warrant does not meet these requirements. Detention without valid remand orders is unlawful and infringes the safeguards of personal liberty and fair procedure under Articles 14, 21 and 22, entitling the accused to bail. en-us Thu, 20 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Dec 2023 11:46:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311329 Continued custody after commitment or adjournment of trial requires a specific remand order showing judicial application of mind. Section 209 governs remand at the commitment stage, while Section 309(2) requires a fresh remand warrant when custody continues after trial is postponed or adjourned. Merely fixing a future appearance date or mechanically endorsing a custody warrant does not meet these requirements. Detention without valid remand orders is unlawful and infringes the safeguards of personal liberty and fair procedure under Articles 14, 21 and 22, entitling the accused to bail. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 20 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311329