https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311328 The initial 24 hours of police detention under Section 57 CrPC are distinct from Magistrate-authorised remand under Section 167, so that period is not counted within the statutory remand period; default bail therefore did not arise on the petitioner's computation. After the police report was filed, the Magistrate took cognizance and continued custody under Section 309, where a separate express remand order was not essential. The court also found reasonable grounds to believe the accused was involved in offences punishable with death or life imprisonment, so bail was not warranted on merits. en-us Fri, 28 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Dec 2023 11:43:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311328 The initial 24 hours of police detention under Section 57 CrPC are distinct from Magistrate-authorised remand under Section 167, so that period is not counted within the statutory remand period; default bail therefore did not arise on the petitioner's computation. After the police report was filed, the Magistrate took cognizance and continued custody under Section 309, where a separate express remand order was not essential. The court also found reasonable grounds to believe the accused was involved in offences punishable with death or life imprisonment, so bail was not warranted on merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 28 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311328