https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311327 An accused committed to the Court of Session under Section 209(b) CrPC remains in custody under the Magistrate's remand order throughout the sessions trial, and the custody does not become illegal merely because the Sessions Court does not pass fresh remand orders at every appearance. Section 309 regulates adjournments and remand for trial management, but it does not displace the continuing remand authorised at commitment. The fifteen-day remand limit in Section 309(2) applies only to Magistrates and does not govern the Court of Session. Accordingly, the habeas corpus challenge to custody failed. en-us Tue, 19 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Dec 2023 11:40:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311327 An accused committed to the Court of Session under Section 209(b) CrPC remains in custody under the Magistrate's remand order throughout the sessions trial, and the custody does not become illegal merely because the Sessions Court does not pass fresh remand orders at every appearance. Section 309 regulates adjournments and remand for trial management, but it does not displace the continuing remand authorised at commitment. The fifteen-day remand limit in Section 309(2) applies only to Magistrates and does not govern the Court of Session. Accordingly, the habeas corpus challenge to custody failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 19 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311327