https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311322 The commentary explains that remand power under the Code rests with the Magistrate and does not depend on a formal request from the police or prosecution. Physical production of the accused is the normal rule, but non-production does not automatically invalidate remand where it was beyond the control of the investigating agency. It further states that in habeas corpus, custody is tested on the date of hearing, so earlier defects in remand do not by themselves require release if a valid order then exists. Judicial orders of criminal courts acting within jurisdiction are not ordinarily quashed by certiorari; the appropriate remedies are appeal, revision, or other available statutory or inherent powers. en-us Tue, 21 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Dec 2023 11:24:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311322 The commentary explains that remand power under the Code rests with the Magistrate and does not depend on a formal request from the police or prosecution. Physical production of the accused is the normal rule, but non-production does not automatically invalidate remand where it was beyond the control of the investigating agency. It further states that in habeas corpus, custody is tested on the date of hearing, so earlier defects in remand do not by themselves require release if a valid order then exists. Judicial orders of criminal courts acting within jurisdiction are not ordinarily quashed by certiorari; the appropriate remedies are appeal, revision, or other available statutory or inherent powers. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 21 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311322