https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34975 The Tribunal allowed the petitioner's claim for losses in the potato business, shares and securities, and scrap dealings, finding them genuine and allowable. However, the Tribunal's attempt to rectify its original order under Section 254(2) was deemed beyond its jurisdiction as it amounted to a review rather than rectification. The writ petition was allowed, and the Tribunal's rectification order was quashed. en-us Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Feb 2013 12:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34975 The Tribunal allowed the petitioner's claim for losses in the potato business, shares and securities, and scrap dealings, finding them genuine and allowable. However, the Tribunal's attempt to rectify its original order under Section 254(2) was deemed beyond its jurisdiction as it amounted to a review rather than rectification. The writ petition was allowed, and the Tribunal's rectification order was quashed. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34975