https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34973 The High Court reviewed a case where petitioners challenged a Tribunal order to deposit duty amount. Comparing it with a similar case, the Court found the petitioners had already deposited significantly. Emphasizing undue hardship and strong case, the Court criticized the Tribunal for dismissing the appeal despite being informed. Consequently, the Court set aside the dismissal order, adjusted the pre-deposit requirement, and directed the Tribunal to proceed with the appeal on merits, underlining its accountability to the Court. The Court made the rule absolute without costs. en-us Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34973 The High Court reviewed a case where petitioners challenged a Tribunal order to deposit duty amount. Comparing it with a similar case, the Court found the petitioners had already deposited significantly. Emphasizing undue hardship and strong case, the Court criticized the Tribunal for dismissing the appeal despite being informed. Consequently, the Court set aside the dismissal order, adjusted the pre-deposit requirement, and directed the Tribunal to proceed with the appeal on merits, underlining its accountability to the Court. The Court made the rule absolute without costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34973